1957 Austin A 40 vs. 1973 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 1973 Mazda RX-3 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1973 Mazda RX-3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Mazda RX-3 (100 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1957 Austin A 40. (49 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Mazda RX-3 should accelerate faster than 1957 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Austin A 40 weights approximately 198 kg more than 1973 Mazda RX-3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Mazda RX-3 (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Austin A 40. (100 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 1973 Mazda RX-3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Austin A 40 | 1973 Mazda RX-3 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | A 40 | RX-3 |
Year Released | 1957 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 100 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 852 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 65 L |