1957 Austin A 40 vs. 1996 Fiat Armadillo
To start off, 1996 Fiat Armadillo is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 1996 Fiat Armadillo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Fiat Armadillo (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1957 Austin A 40. (49 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Armadillo should accelerate faster than 1957 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Fiat Armadillo weights approximately 324 kg more than 1957 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Fiat Armadillo (200 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Austin A 40. (100 Nm). This means 1996 Fiat Armadillo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Austin A 40. 1996 Fiat Armadillo has automatic transmission and 1957 Austin A 40 has manual transmission. 1957 Austin A 40 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Fiat Armadillo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Austin A 40 | 1996 Fiat Armadillo | |
Make | Austin | Fiat |
Model | A 40 | Armadillo |
Year Released | 1957 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 100 Nm | 200 Nm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1374 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 1850 mm |