1957 Austin A 40 vs. 2011 Nissan Note
To start off, 2011 Nissan Note is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,489 cc (4 cylinders), 1957 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Note (89 HP) has 40 more horse power than 1957 Austin A 40. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Note should accelerate faster than 1957 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Nissan Note weights approximately 2 kg more than 1957 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1957 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Note, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Austin A 40 | 2011 Nissan Note | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 40 | Note |
Year Released | 1957 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 1386 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1052 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4083 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1691 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2600 mm |