1957 Austin A 55 vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Austin A 55. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Austin A 55 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ecosport (109 HP) has 58 more horse power than 1957 Austin A 55. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1957 Austin A 55.
Because 1957 Austin A 55 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Austin A 55. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Austin A 55 | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | A 55 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1957 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2490 mm |