1957 Austin A 95 vs. 1981 Renault 18
To start off, 1981 Renault 18 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Austin A 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Austin A 95 would be higher. At 2,639 cc (6 cylinders), 1957 Austin A 95 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Austin A 95 (91 HP) has 4 more horse power than 1981 Renault 18. (87 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Austin A 95 should accelerate faster than 1981 Renault 18.
Because 1957 Austin A 95 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Austin A 95. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Renault 18, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Renault 18 (181 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Austin A 95. (176 Nm). This means 1981 Renault 18 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Austin A 95.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Austin A 95 | 1981 Renault 18 | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | A 95 | 18 |
Year Released | 1957 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2639 cc | 2068 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 87 HP |
Torque | 176 Nm | 181 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1410 mm |