1957 Austin A 95 vs. 1982 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 1982 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Austin A 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Austin A 95 would be higher. At 2,639 cc (6 cylinders), 1957 Austin A 95 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Austin A 95 (91 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1982 Fiat Ritmo. (83 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Austin A 95 should accelerate faster than 1982 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Austin A 95 weights approximately 430 kg more than 1982 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1957 Austin A 95 (176 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1957 Austin A 95 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Austin A 95 | 1982 Fiat Ritmo | |
Make | Austin | Fiat |
Model | A 95 | Ritmo |
Year Released | 1957 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2639 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 57 L |