1957 Austin A 95 vs. 1999 Nissan SUT
To start off, 1999 Nissan SUT is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Austin A 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Austin A 95 would be higher. At 3,299 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Nissan SUT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan SUT (140 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1957 Austin A 95. (91 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan SUT should accelerate faster than 1957 Austin A 95.
Because 1999 Nissan SUT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1957 Austin A 95. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Nissan SUT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan SUT (372 Nm) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Austin A 95. (176 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan SUT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Austin A 95. 1999 Nissan SUT has automatic transmission and 1957 Austin A 95 has manual transmission. 1957 Austin A 95 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan SUT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Austin A 95 | 1999 Nissan SUT | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 95 | SUT |
Year Released | 1957 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2639 cc | 3299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 372 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |