1957 Austin A135 vs. 1964 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1964 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Austin A135. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Austin A135 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1957 Austin A135. (148 HP @ 4100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1957 Austin A135. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Austin A135 weights approximately 34 kg more than 1964 Cadillac DeVille.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Austin A135 | 1964 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A135 | DeVille |
| Year Released | 1957 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3993 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.6:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2080 kg | 2046 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 79 L |
