1957 Austin A135 vs. 1979 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1979 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Austin A135. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Austin A135 would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1957 Austin A135 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Austin A135 weights approximately 1270 kg more than 1979 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1957 Austin A135 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Austin A135. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Austin A135 | 1979 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | A135 | Colt |
Year Released | 1957 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 1244 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2080 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2310 mm |