1957 Austin A135 vs. 2001 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2001 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Austin A135. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Austin A135 would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1957 Austin A135 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP) has 42 more horse power than 1957 Austin A135. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1957 Austin A135.
Because 2001 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1957 Austin A135. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1957 Austin A135 (308 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Jeep Wrangler. (301 Nm). This means 1957 Austin A135 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Austin A135 | 2001 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Austin | Jeep |
| Model | A135 | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3993 cc | 3969 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 190 HP |
| Torque | 308 Nm | 301 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2380 mm |
