1957 Austin A135 vs. 2003 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Austin A135. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Austin A135 would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1957 Austin A135 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Ram (173 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1957 Austin A135. (148 HP @ 4100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1957 Austin A135. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Austin A135 weights approximately 10 kg more than 2003 Dodge Ram.
Because 2003 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1957 Austin A135. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1957 Austin A135 (308 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Dodge Ram. (305 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1957 Austin A135 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Dodge Ram.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Austin A135 | 2003 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Austin | Dodge |
Model | A135 | Ram |
Year Released | 1957 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 3906 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 308 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2080 kg | 2070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 2030 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2790 mm |