1957 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 2004 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 2,639 cc (6 cylinders), 1957 Austin-Healey 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Ranger weights approximately 600 kg more than 1957 Austin-Healey 100.
Because 2004 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1957 Austin-Healey 100. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Austin-Healey 100 | 2004 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Ford |
Model | 100 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1957 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2639 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 3010 mm |