1957 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible vs. 1964 Holden EJ
To start off, 1964 Holden EJ is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1957 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible (105 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1964 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible weights approximately 322 kg more than 1964 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1957 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible (190 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 1957 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible | 1964 Holden EJ | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Holden |
| Model | Sports Convertible | EJ |
| Year Released | 1957 | 1964 |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 1130 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2680 mm |
