1957 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1957 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible (105 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (81 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible weights approximately 632 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1957 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible (190 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (112 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1957 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible | 2003 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | MCC |
| Model | Sports Convertible | Smart |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 112 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2370 mm |
