1957 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1960 Toyota Master RR is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP) has 65 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 320 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Toyota |
| Model | Tickford | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1957 | 1960 |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2540 mm |
