1957 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1961 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1961 Cadillac 62 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 540 kg more than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1961 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 398 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm). This means 1961 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1961 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Cadillac |
Model | Tickford | 62 |
Year Released | 1957 | 1961 |
Engine Size | 2441 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 582 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 2070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3300 mm |