1957 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1976 Mazda 929
To start off, 1976 Mazda 929 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1976 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 456 kg more than 1976 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda 929. (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1976 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Mazda |
Model | Tickford | 929 |
Year Released | 1957 | 1976 |
Engine Size | 2441 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 134 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1074 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2520 mm |