1957 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1982 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (163 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1982 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Chevrolet |
| Model | Tickford | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1957 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 4995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 325 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2570 mm |
