1957 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2000 BMW 528
To start off, 2000 BMW 528 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW 528 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 528 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 223 more horse power than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 528 should accelerate faster than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW 528 weights approximately 140 kg more than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW 528 (279 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm). This means 2000 BMW 528 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2000 BMW 528 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | BMW |
| Model | Tickford | 528 |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2000 |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 2926 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 328 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7400 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 279 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1670 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2840 mm |
