1957 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2000 Renault P55
To start off, 2000 Renault P55 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Renault P55 (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Renault P55 should accelerate faster than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Renault P55 weights approximately 240 kg more than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Renault P55 (260 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm). This means 2000 Renault P55 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2000 Renault P55 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Renault |
| Model | Tickford | P55 |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2000 |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 900 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 260 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1770 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2480 mm |
