1957 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (94 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 480 kg more than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK (460 Nm) has 276 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm). This means 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Tickford | CLK |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2001 |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 460 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 2010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2720 mm |
