1957 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2001 Mitsubishi SUW
To start off, 2001 Mitsubishi SUW is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mitsubishi SUW (120 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi SUW should accelerate faster than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mitsubishi SUW weights approximately 375 kg more than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mitsubishi SUW (240 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm). This means 2001 Mitsubishi SUW will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2001 Mitsubishi SUW | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Tickford | SUW |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2001 |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 1097 cc |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1905 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2630 mm |
