1957 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2002 Suzuki F1 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 60 kg more than 2002 Suzuki F1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Suzuki |
| Model | Tickford | F1 |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 1995 cc |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1470 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2210 mm |
