1957 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2003 Renault Scenic II
To start off, 2003 Renault Scenic II is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Scenic II (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Scenic II should accelerate faster than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 210 kg more than 2003 Renault Scenic II.
Let's talk about torque, 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Scenic II. (152 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Scenic II.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2003 Renault Scenic II | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Renault |
| Model | Tickford | Scenic II |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 152 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2670 mm |
