1957 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2004 Citroen Xsara
To start off, 2004 Citroen Xsara is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP) has 31 more horse power than 2004 Citroen Xsara. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen Xsara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 346 kg more than 2004 Citroen Xsara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen Xsara. (115 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen Xsara.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2004 Citroen Xsara | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Citroen |
| Model | Tickford | Xsara |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 1360 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 74 HP |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1184 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2610 mm |
