1957 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2004 Ford Maverick
To start off, 2004 Ford Maverick is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,441 cc (4 cylinders), 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Maverick (122 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Maverick should accelerate faster than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 15 kg more than 2004 Ford Maverick.
Let's talk about torque, 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Maverick. (175 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Maverick.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2004 Ford Maverick | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Ford |
| Model | Tickford | Maverick |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 1983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1515 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2730 mm |
