1957 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2007 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (338 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2007 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Mazda |
| Model | Tickford | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2007 |
| Engine Size | 2441 cc | 3496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 263 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 338 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2880 mm |
