1957 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 4,197 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover (391 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 286 more horse power than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1102 kg more than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover (560 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 376 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2008 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Land Rover |
Model | Tickford | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1957 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 2441 cc | 4197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 391 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 560 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 2632 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2890 mm |