1957 Austin Princess vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker

To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1957 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1957 Austin Princess. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1957 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Austin Princess weights approximately 807 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.

Because 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1957 Austin Princess. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1957 Austin Princess (251 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 1957 Austin Princess will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.

Compare all specifications:

1957 Austin Princess 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
Make Austin Chevrolet
Model Princess Tracker
Year Released 1957 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3992 cc 2491 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 118 HP 165 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 251 Nm 221 Nm
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 2180 kg 1373 kg
Vehicle Length 5470 mm 4140 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1780 mm 1690 mm
Wheelbase Size 3360 mm 2660 mm