1957 Berkeley Sports vs. 2009 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2009 Nissan Rogue is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Berkeley Sports. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Berkeley Sports would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Rogue (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1957 Berkeley Sports. (15 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 1957 Berkeley Sports. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan Rogue weights approximately 1323 kg more than 1957 Berkeley Sports. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Nissan Rogue is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1957 Berkeley Sports. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Rogue will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan Rogue (237 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Berkeley Sports. (49 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan Rogue will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Berkeley Sports.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Berkeley Sports | 2009 Nissan Rogue | |
| Make | Berkeley | Nissan |
| Model | Sports | Rogue |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 322 cc | 2488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 15 HP | 170 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 49 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 60 mm | 99.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 57 mm | 82.8 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 282 kg | 1605 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1280 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1780 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 15 L | 60 L |
