1957 BMW 501 vs. 1996 Holden XU 6
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 BMW 501 would be higher.
Because 1957 BMW 501 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 BMW 501. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 292 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 BMW 501. (223 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 BMW 501.
Compare all specifications:
1957 BMW 501 | 1996 Holden XU 6 | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | 501 | XU 6 |
Year Released | 1957 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 223 Nm | 515 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |