1957 BMW 501 vs. 2008 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 BMW 501 would be higher. At 3,725 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (270 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1957 BMW 501. (138 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1957 BMW 501. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 BMW 501 weights approximately 76 kg more than 2008 Mazda CX-9.
Because 2008 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1957 BMW 501. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (370 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 BMW 501. (223 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 BMW 501.
Compare all specifications:
1957 BMW 501 | 2008 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 501 | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1957 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3168 cc | 3725 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 223 Nm | 370 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1405 kg | 1329 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2880 mm |