1957 BMW 502 vs. 1953 Hudson Super Wasp
To start off, 1957 BMW 502 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Super Wasp would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp (140 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1957 BMW 502. (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp should accelerate faster than 1957 BMW 502. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Hudson Super Wasp weights approximately 189 kg more than 1957 BMW 502. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 BMW 502 | 1953 Hudson Super Wasp | |
Make | BMW | Hudson |
Model | 502 | Super Wasp |
Year Released | 1957 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2579 cc | 4293 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1599 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 75 L |