1957 BMW 502 vs. 1968 Reliant Regal
To start off, 1968 Reliant Regal is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 BMW 502 would be higher. At 2,579 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 BMW 502 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 BMW 502 (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1968 Reliant Regal. (29 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 BMW 502 should accelerate faster than 1968 Reliant Regal. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 BMW 502 weights approximately 955 kg more than 1968 Reliant Regal. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 BMW 502 | 1968 Reliant Regal | |
| Make | BMW | Reliant |
| Model | 502 | Regal |
| Year Released | 1957 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2579 cc | 700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 29 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 455 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 3440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 1940 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 27 L |
