1957 BMW 502 vs. 2004 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 BMW 502 would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1957 BMW 502. (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1957 BMW 502. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 BMW 502 weights approximately 202 kg more than 2004 Ford Ranger.
Because 2004 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1957 BMW 502. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 BMW 502 | 2004 Ford Ranger | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 502 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1957 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2579 cc | 4015 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1208 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 74 L |