1957 BMW 502 vs. 2005 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 BMW 502 would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Astro (187 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1957 BMW 502. (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 1957 BMW 502. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 540 kg more than 1957 BMW 502. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 BMW 502 | 2005 Chevrolet Astro | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 502 | Astro |
Year Released | 1957 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2579 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 117 L |