1957 BMW 502 vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 BMW 502 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1957 BMW 502. (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1957 BMW 502.
Because 1957 BMW 502 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 BMW 502. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 BMW 502 | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 502 | E-350 |
Year Released | 1957 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2579 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 57 L |