1957 BMW Isetta vs. 1998 Lotus Emme
To start off, 1998 Lotus Emme is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 BMW Isetta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 BMW Isetta would be higher. At 2,174 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Lotus Emme is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Lotus Emme (260 HP) has 247 more horse power than 1957 BMW Isetta. (13 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Lotus Emme should accelerate faster than 1957 BMW Isetta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Lotus Emme weights approximately 312 kg more than 1957 BMW Isetta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 BMW Isetta | 1998 Lotus Emme | |
Make | BMW | Lotus |
Model | Isetta | Emme |
Year Released | 1957 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 247 cc | 2174 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 1 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | single | in-line |
Horse Power | 13 HP | 260 HP |
Top Speed | 85 km/hour | 275 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 366 kg | 678 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2300 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1510 mm | 2770 mm |