1957 BMW Isetta vs. 2003 Mazda 3
To start off, 2003 Mazda 3 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 BMW Isetta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 BMW Isetta would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 3 (100 HP) has 87 more horse power than 1957 BMW Isetta. (13 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1957 BMW Isetta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 3 weights approximately 894 kg more than 1957 BMW Isetta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1957 BMW Isetta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 BMW Isetta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 BMW Isetta | 2003 Mazda 3 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | Isetta | 3 |
Year Released | 1957 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 247 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 1 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | single | in-line |
Horse Power | 13 HP | 100 HP |
Top Speed | 85 km/hour | 182 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 1 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 366 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2300 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1510 mm | 2650 mm |