1957 BMW Isetta vs. 2004 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 BMW Isetta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 BMW Isetta would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (220 HP) has 207 more horse power than 1957 BMW Isetta. (13 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1957 BMW Isetta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1226 kg more than 1957 BMW Isetta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 BMW Isetta | 2004 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | Isetta | CTS |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 247 cc | 3179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 1 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | single | V |
| Horse Power | 13 HP | 220 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 1 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 366 kg | 1592 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2300 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1510 mm | 2890 mm |
