1957 BMW Isetta vs. 2006 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 BMW Isetta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 BMW Isetta would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (179 HP) has 166 more horse power than 1957 BMW Isetta. (13 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1957 BMW Isetta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1428 kg more than 1957 BMW Isetta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 BMW Isetta | 2006 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | Isetta | CTS |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 247 cc | 2597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 1 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | single | V |
| Horse Power | 13 HP | 179 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Top Speed | 85 km/hour | 223 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 1 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 366 kg | 1794 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2300 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1510 mm | 2890 mm |
