1957 Buick 40 vs. 1950 Holden FX
To start off, 1957 Buick 40 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Buick 40 (248 HP) has 197 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Buick 40 weights approximately 825 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1957 Buick 40 (515 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 379 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1957 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Buick 40 | 1950 Holden FX | |
Make | Buick | Holden |
Model | 40 | FX |
Year Released | 1957 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 2165 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 248 HP | 51 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1795 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2620 mm |