1957 Buick 40 vs. 1963 Rover 2000
To start off, 1963 Rover 2000 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Buick 40 (248 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1963 Rover 2000. (91 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1963 Rover 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Buick 40 weights approximately 583 kg more than 1963 Rover 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1957 Buick 40 (515 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 365 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Rover 2000. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1957 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Rover 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Buick 40 | 1963 Rover 2000 | |
| Make | Buick | Rover |
| Model | 40 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1957 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5967 cc | 1978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 248 HP | 91 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 515 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1795 kg | 1212 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2630 mm |
