1957 Buick 40 vs. 1974 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1974 Triumph 2000 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Buick 40 (248 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1974 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1974 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Buick 40 weights approximately 550 kg more than 1974 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1957 Buick 40 (515 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 380 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1957 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Buick 40 | 1974 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Buick | Triumph |
Model | 40 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1957 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 248 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 515 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1795 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2700 mm |