1957 Buick 40 vs. 2000 Saturn L

To start off, 2000 Saturn L is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Buick 40 (248 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 2000 Saturn L. (182 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2000 Saturn L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Buick 40 weights approximately 351 kg more than 2000 Saturn L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1957 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Saturn L, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1957 Buick 40 (515 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Saturn L. (257 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1957 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Saturn L.

Compare all specifications: