1957 Buick 40 vs. 2002 Honda Saber
To start off, 2002 Honda Saber is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Buick 40 (248 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2002 Honda Saber. (210 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda Saber. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Buick 40 weights approximately 955 kg more than 2002 Honda Saber. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1957 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Saber, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Buick 40 | 2002 Honda Saber | |
| Make | Buick | Honda |
| Model | 40 | Saber |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5967 cc | 3205 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 248 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1795 kg | 840 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2690 mm |
