1957 Buick 40 vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2002 Suzuki F1 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Buick 40 (248 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Buick 40 weights approximately 325 kg more than 2002 Suzuki F1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1957 Buick 40 (515 Nm) has 409 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 1957 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Buick 40 | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
Make | Buick | Suzuki |
Model | 40 | F1 |
Year Released | 1957 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 1995 cc |
Horse Power | 248 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 515 Nm | 106 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1795 kg | 1470 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2210 mm |