1957 Buick 40 vs. 2003 Studebaker Avanti
To start off, 2003 Studebaker Avanti is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1957 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Studebaker Avanti, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Buick 40 | 2003 Studebaker Avanti | |
Make | Buick | Studebaker |
Model | 40 | Avanti |
Year Released | 1957 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 5665 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 248 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |