1957 Buick 40 vs. 2005 Zastava 103

To start off, 2005 Zastava 103 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Buick 40 (248 HP) has 189 more horse power than 2005 Zastava 103. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2005 Zastava 103. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Buick 40 weights approximately 875 kg more than 2005 Zastava 103. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1957 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Zastava 103, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1957 Buick 40 (515 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 427 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Zastava 103. (88 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1957 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Zastava 103.

Compare all specifications: