1957 Buick 40 vs. 2006 Mazda 5
To start off, 2006 Mazda 5 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Buick 40 (248 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 5. (157 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 5.
Because 1957 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1957 Buick 40 (515 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 314 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 5. (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1957 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Buick 40 | 2006 Mazda 5 | |
| Make | Buick | Mazda |
| Model | 40 | 5 |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5967 cc | 2262 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 248 HP | 157 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 515 Nm | 201 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2760 mm |
